Skip to main content
Comparison

Mantine vs Ninna UI

Full-featured React component library with 120+ components. Compare Mantine and Ninna UI side by side to find which React component library fits your project in 2026.

Quick Verdict

Mantine is a fantastic batteries-included library with 100+ components and hooks. If you want everything in one box and don't mind a JavaScript theming runtime, it's hard to beat. Ninna UI is more focused and intentionally smaller, trading breadth for a zero-runtime CSS theming model and a tree-shakeable package layout.

Feature Comparison

Side-by-side comparison of key features between Mantine and Ninna UI.

FeatureNinna UIMantine
Installation modelnpm packages (12 scoped packages)npm packages (@mantine/core + many addons)
Theming approachCSS imports only - zero JS configJavaScript MantineProvider + createTheme()
Dark modeAutomatic via CSS - no provider neededColorSchemeProvider (JS runtime)
Component count67 components120+ components
AccessibilityRadix UI internally for complex widgetsBuilt-in ARIA compliance
Bundle sizeTree-shakeable, CSS-only themingLarge (many packages + PostCSS)
Tailwind CSSv4 native (CSS-first config)Optional v3 integration (not native)
TypeScriptStrict mode, data-slot typesExcellent type coverage
Customization98 data-slot CSS targets + cn()JS theme object (createTheme)
MaintenanceStandard npm updateStandard npm update
SSR supportFull (React Router / Next.js)Good support
React versionReact 19+React 18+
Color systemoklch perceptual colorsOpen Color palette
Learning curveLow - CSS imports + React propsHigh - complex API surface
Update mechanismnpm update (semver)npm update (semver)

Why choose Ninna UI

Key advantages of Ninna UI over Mantine for your next project.

CSS-only theming - no MantineProvider wrappers or JS config needed

Tailwind CSS v4 native - Mantine uses its own PostCSS-based system

Dramatically simpler API surface - 67 focused components vs 120+ sprawling API

Smaller bundle - no PostCSS build step for component styles

Lower learning curve - CSS imports + React props vs complex Mantine API

Honest trade-offs

Where Mantine has advantages - we believe in transparent comparisons.

120+ components - far more extensive (dates, charts, rich text, etc.)

Mature ecosystem with comprehensive documentation

Built-in form management (@mantine/form)

Supports React 18 (Ninna UI requires React 19+)

Excellent TypeScript coverage across all packages

Migrating from Mantine

Step-by-step guide to move your project from Mantine to Ninna UI.

  1. 1

    Remove `MantineProvider` wrapper from your app root

  2. 2

    Replace `@mantine/*` imports with appropriate `@ninna-ui/*` packages

  3. 3

    Replace `createTheme()` with CSS theme preset import - no JS config needed

  4. 4

    Remove PostCSS configuration - Ninna UI uses Tailwind CSS v4

  5. 5

    Note: Fewer components initially, but smaller bundle and CSS-only theming

Ready to try Ninna UI?

Install in under 60 seconds. One CSS import, zero JavaScript config.

npm install @ninna-ui/core @ninna-ui/primitives

Looking for a Mantine alternative?

See why developers switch from Mantine to Ninna UI

Mantine vs Ninna UI: FAQ

Is Ninna UI as feature-complete as Mantine?

Not in raw count — Mantine ships more components and utility hooks. Ninna UI focuses on a core set of 67 accessible components with a smaller, tree-shakeable footprint and CSS-only theming.

How does theming differ from Mantine?

Mantine uses a MantineProvider and a JS theme object. Ninna UI uses CSS custom properties with oklch colors and no provider, so theme switching happens in CSS with zero hydration cost.

Which has better SSR behaviour?

Both support SSR, but Ninna UI's lack of a theming runtime means there's no provider to hydrate and no flash of unstyled or mis-themed content.


More comparisons

Ninna UI for your framework

This comparison page is for informational purposes only. Information is based on official documentation and public data. All trademarks, logos, and brand names are the property of their respective owners. Last updated: March 2026.